Tag Archive for obama

Gorelick

National  Security
Joe Boyles
Guest Columnist

After 10 years of service as the nation’s top cop, FBI Director Robert Mueller recently announced that he is stepping down.  The Washington rumor mill suggests that President Obama is considering the appointment of Jamie S. Gorelick to the post.  I don’t think he’ll do it and here’s why:
Jamie Gorelick played a principal role in the two greatest national security disasters our nation has faced since World War II, both of which cost us trillions.  During the Clinton Administration, she became the Assistant Attorney General under Janet Reno in 1994.  The next year, she published a memo that created a wall of separation between law enforcement and intelligence gathering that became known in the Justice Department as the “Gorelick Wall.”
The theory behind the Gorelick Wall was that terrorism was a law enforcement issue and we did not want to risk spoiling evidence that could be used during prosecution by sharing intelligence between agencies.  Gorelick was thinking like a prosecutor.  She was not thinking like someone trying to prevent an attack on our country and its citizens.
Six years later, that attack happened on September 11, 2001.  It was the worst in our nation’s history and resulted in the deaths of more than 3,000 innocents.
The best opportunity to thwart the attack before it actually occurred was with the August detention of the so-called 20th hijacker, Zacharius Moussaoui in Minneapolis by the FBI.  Agents wanted to question Moussaou, and crack open his laptop computer, but headquarters refused to allow this, citing the Gorelick Wall and concern that his prosecution would be compromised by privacy and due process issues.  One of the frustrated agents complained that “someday, someone will die” because of this policy.  In less than two weeks, “someday” happened and 3, 000 “someones” perished.
But by this time, Jamie Gorelick was no longer around the Justice Department.  She had left her “time bomb” behind and was now vice president of the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA), also known as Fannie Mae.  Fannie Mae is a government sponsored enterprise (GSE).  As a place where private and public money mix, it has long been used by politicians to pay off political debts.  Impoverished public servants like Jamie Gorelick can line their pockets at a place like Fannie Mae, and she did.

From 1997 to 2003, Gorelick was paid more than $26 million.  That was a lot more lucrative than her previous six years in the Clinton Administration.
Not only was she paid a lot of money for her FNMA tenure, but she also helped “cook the books.”  When normal accounting rules would have recorded losses and resulted in withheld bonuses to executives, creative accounting was used to shift losses to other years, enabling fat cats like Gorelick to walk away with big bonuses.  As Gorelick was leaving Fannie Mae, these accounting errors were uncovered and resulted in a major scandal and subsequent restatement going back three years.
You might ask what qualifications Gorelick had for the appointment as VP for Fannie Mae and the answer would be “nothing.”  She was a lawyer with no background or experience in banking or mortgage lending.  Maybe that’s why she had no compunction against moving Fannie into the subprime loan business with securitized financial instruments.  Let’s call that “time bomb 2.”  When this financial mess blew up in the fall of 2008 and resulted in the worst financial disaster since the Great Depression, Jamie had moved on.
The reason why I believe someone other than Gorelick will be selected to head the FBI is that her confirmation hearing before the Senate would result in very embarrassing questions on both of these matters … and others.  Although the Democrats control the Senate and Judiciary Committee, they would be unable to shield her from very pointed questions coming from Republicans who believe that neither of these matters were properly exposed and investigated.  The confirmation hearings would likely prove very embarrassing, not only to Gorelick, but to Democrats in general.
I believe that Jamie Gorelick made some monumental errors for which she has never been held accountable.  For this reason, I feel she is unqualified to be the top law enforcement officer in our country.  I doubt if she can be confirmed and if Obama tries, the process will be so bloody that he’ll decide to avoid it.

Share

CRENSHAW VOTES TO REPEAL OBAMACARE; SUPPORTS REPLACEMENT WITH REFORMS TO LOWER HEALTH CARE COSTS, GROW ECONOMY

Submitted by Ander Crenshaw’s Office

WASHINGTON, DC – Congressman Ander Crenshaw today (1/19) voted to repeal ObamaCare and will fight on to replace the new law with reforms that will lower health care costs and grow the economy.

“Dollar for dollar the numbers didn’t add up when I opposed ObamaCare before, and they don’t add up now. Raising taxes, imposing new mandates, and increasing uncertainty for employers and entrepreneurs is not what we need in a time of double digit unemployment and massive debt,” said Crenshaw, who urged his colleagues to support repeal in a House floor speech. “That’s why I support this law’s repeal and back its replacement with common-sense reforms to lower health care costs and protect jobs.”

“My constituents did not ask for policy that would weaken our economy and eliminate jobs. They didn’t ask for mandates to stand in the way of economic progress. They didn’t ask for cuts to Medicare.  And, they certainly did not ask for costly new taxes,” Crenshaw continued. “Yet, that’s what they have, and Congress is now in the position to brighten this stormy economic picture with policy that makes sense.”  

“My focus remains on the positive: passing reforms that stimulate the economy, like tax cuts and less red tape; on making sure patients can choose their own doctors and get the treatment they need when they need it; and on making sure the government doesn’t control delivery of health care in this country,” said Crenshaw. “These are the types of policy changes my constituents told me they wanted, and I’m standing by them as we move forward.”

Congressman Crenshaw voted against the Democrats’, 2,000-page, budget-busting health care bill on November 7, 2009 and again on March 21, 2010. He has a strong record of supporting health care reform and supported the Republican plan in November, 2009. The Congressional Budget Office found that plan would lower health care costs, increases access, maintain Medicare benefits, end lawsuit abuse and preserve the doctor/patient relationship all without raising taxes.

Crenshaw has a strong record of supporting health care reform and has supported the following steps to cuts costs, increase accesss, and restore choice by:

• Erasing arbitrary rules that currently restrict consumers from purchasing across state lines.

• Prohibiting insurers from discriminating against a consumer based on pre-existing conditions, one’s health history or future risk.

• Making insurance plans portable so if you change jobs, you don’t have to change plans.

• Mandating all insurance providers describe their plans with plain language so consumers know what they are getting.

• Allowing small businesses, the self-employed, and others to band together and purchase health insurance at lower costs, resulting in more coverage for more people.
• Passing comprehensive medical liability reform that will prohibit frivolous lawsuits that cost our country $126 billion every year and allow doctors to freely provide the best care possible.

• Offering immediate and substantial financial assistance, through new, refundable and advanceable tax credits to the working poor.

• Promoting prevention and wellness by giving employers and insurers greater flexibility to financially reward employees who seek to achieve or maintain a healthy weight, quit smoking, and manage chronic illnesses like diabetes.

• Rewarding high-quality care, instead of encouraging health care providers to order more and unnecessary services.

Crenshaw has co-sponsored a number of common-sense health reform bills, including the following pieces of legislation:

  • Help Efficient, Accessible, Low-cost, Timely Healthcare (HEALTH) Act 

(H.R. 1086) – Medical liability reform bill that would limit non-economic damages and statute of limitations on lawsuits, and restrict attorney fees.

  • Small Business Health Fairness Act of 2009 (H.R. 2607) – Small business health plan reform bill that would increase bargaining power of small businesses with insurance providers, lower costs by as much as 30%, and free small businesses from state mandates.
  • Promoting Health and Preventing Chronic Disease through  Prevention and Wellness Programs for Employees, Communities, and Individuals Act of 2009 (H.R. 3468) – Bill would provide citizens with a credit of up to 50% of wellness program and make competitive grants to eligible entities to plan and implement prevention and wellness programs that promote health and wellness and prevent chronic disease.
  • Improved Employee Access to Health Insurance Act of 2009  (H.R. 3821) – Bill would prohibit states from establishing a law that prevents an employer from instituting an auto-enrollment process for coverage of a participant.
  • Health Insurance Access for Young Workers and College Students Act of 2009 (H.R. 3887) – Bill would improve health insurance coverage of dependents by allowing young adults to stay on their parents’ plans until 25 years.
  • Health Care Choice Act (H.R. 3217) – Bill would allow for the purchase policies across state lines.
Share